It is a well known fact to most people I know that Sexual Assault and Rape are amongst the few things I find the most disgusting about humanity. Rapists are individuals who believe themselves above the rules of other mere mortals. They are a dealt with accordingly in the press, courts and society i.e. they are scorned, shunned and ostracised and should NEVER be allowed to forgot their deeds. There is no rehabilitation for these people because they cannot change what they are. But equally I pour scorn on the those individuals that falsely accuse or manipulate themselves into being seen as the victim. So as it happens this week in the news there is the case of Labour MP for Rochdale; Simon Danczuk.
This man in the picture is a divorcee, a campaigner against child sexual grooming and pedophilia. He also happens to like females with ample chesticles. Which according to most of the male species is not illegal or abnormal, just slightly sad and pathetic. Nevertheless this man has been outed as having swapped SEXTs with a 17 year old girl who ‘was looking for a job with him’. Now the inverted commas are for a reason, who approaches a prospective employer cleavage first?? The answer is nobody!! Why? Because it gives off the impression you wish to be objectified and viewed sexually. Now i’m all for females being free to express themselves however they choose, but to pretend that taking a self-portrait in such a coy fashion is anything other than titilation is plainly a con.
Sophena Houlihan is the young lady in question, 17 years old (Age of Consent in the United Kingdom is 16 years of age) and clearly very aware of how much attention her ample cleavage would garner her. For her to engage in back and forth text messaging with the 49 year old MP is a manipulation of the facts. And in my opinion she should be ashamed of herself.
To claim shock at the messages she received is a ridiculous notion, she is replying in full awareness of his response to her and I would even suggest she is goading him to write even more explicit things. This was the grand design of a 17 year old unemployed girl, with no idea of how to behave and even less care for the man she was going to destroy. But here are a select few of the messages as published in the Daily Mail UK newspaper-
The whole episode screams set up either by Labour Party cronies that don’t like Mr Danczuk’s less that supportive comments about the new lefty leader Corbyn or by this horror of a teenage girl who thinks notoriety is the same as celebrity. No doubt she got a nice big fat cheque to go with the shock she felt at the exchange of texts.
But that holier than thou look on her face as holds up the phone and the inference in the headline that Mr Danczuk has done something almost illegal is clear. She is 17, past the age of consent and clearly sexually self-aware. The MP although his judgement is questionable and bordering on the gross, he has committed no crime. One of his less than helpful constituents asked the Greater Manchester Police to investigate and they were quick to point out that Mr Danczuk had committed no crime.
In fact the only crime here is a moral one, the old fool that is the MP and the little madam who snared him in a trap for her five minutes of fame. Females such as this make me sick and in fact make real victims subject to abuse of doubters and defence barristers. She deserves a kick up the backside and the MP needs to revaluate his priorities. Otherwise its a witch hunt of a man who doesn’t support his party leader and a tit of a girl who thinks that notoriety is preferable to a normal decent existence. In my humble opinion the press have once again got it all wrong and Simon Danczuk MP is the victim and Sophena Houlihan is the perverse manipulator.
Well this is my first blog it has been said that creation of this blog is an attempt to avoid working on my PhD! For once it is probably right but I’m as likely to admit that to those perceptive souls as Gary Barlow is to pay is his Tax bill (oops)! Anyway two things happened this week that have changed me forever, firstly I found the music of Betty Who (she is awesome so check her out!); my dressing routine will never be the same again thanks to Betty and her electronic pop tunes! Secondly and quite by accident I discovered the Porn Actor, Director and all round Porn King that is James Deen! So I already know what your thinking here; this woman just admitted she watches porn and to the world no less or at the very least the single person to come across this blog whilst clicking the wrong link. Well people I found him after reading an article on Huff Post. It was an article written by Jenn Tisdale and her porn experience with James Deen written more than a year ago I might add. Being a woman with a fairly broad mind and view of each to their own, I thought it brave of Jenn Tisdale. So I proceeded to read her article with curious interest. Who was this James dude and why would a woman not previously involved in the Porn Industry, not just willing but actively seek out a porn experience? So in reading the article I find that it hadn’t occurred to her before (that’s what she says) but a request sent out by this James Deen guy to have amateur woman indulge in a porn shoot with him; was found and she applied. Now I’ve looked already, yes you can still apply to enjoy a session with this guy on camera. Hell who wouldn’t; have a look he is damn fine in more ways than one (discovered in the course of my research on this blog), but do women really wanna do the No Pants Dance on camera? Well Jenn Tisdale did, I’ve seen it and she is great in it!! True I have limited experience with reviews of porn vids but its definitely an improvement on the porn I have seen which was laughable rather than arousing! However this ‘porno’ is slightly more home video porn than industry standard, maybe that’s why I found it not just bearable but interesting! So in getting to the point here, with publication of a new porno book (sorry erotic fiction) every other week, and the trailer for Fifty Shades of Grey going viral; I ask has our view of sex changed or is it that we are just acknowledging that people can and do indulge in all sorts of things and sometimes a camera is involved? Jenn Tisdale states in the video she would not being doing ‘porn’ if it wasn’t with James Deen, hell I wouldn’t do porn but I might be coaxed if it were him (my mother’s eyebrow just raised)! That said the idea of my boney ass being online terrifies the life out of me more than my god damn VIVA in 2 years. But James Deen does not look or from what I’ve seen act like the typical porn star, in fact he behaves; when in his porn role as more serial seducer than serial killer (which must have been a relief for Jenn Tisdale). But with the BDSM tale of Mr Grey and other books that reiterate that women what nothing more than a man to control them in the bedroom and to buy them the latest gadget outside, are we circling back from Ladette culture and moving into the post-ladette world where a so-called Alpha is all we want. I don’t want a dude to tie me up, not my thing but I do find it endlessly fascinating reading about it and I wonder is that where we’re at. Where we can imagine ourselves doing anything and everything but in real life its the guy who brings you the cuppa that is god!! My friends are in one of two camps, the lets just get a bloke who can spell his own name and then we can work with the rest, the other is let’s get up to freakiest shit imaginable. I admire the second for their openness and courage to experiment but when they fall through wardrobe roofs and end up locked inside I do question the attraction to it. I have been called a prude in the past, but hey is it prudish to just not want to witness a friend performing fellatio at a dining table in a restaurant? I think not!! Equally I did not appreciate the follow-up which was having to wait for an elevator as they did the deed up against the adjacent wall. I was however impressed with this former friends ability to f**k and tell me “I was such a prude” at the same time. Anyway as I look forward to the release of another filthy book tonight (The Redeemer by J.D. Chase) I wonder I am the only female puzzled as to why I love reading about a girl being called a ‘filthy whore’ but if a guy called me that in life I would give his vitals a quick karate chop. Is this fascination because I’m exactly what my ex-friend said ‘a prude’ or is it because these modern erotic/porno books let me life vicariously through the female leads without running the risk of rope burn myself??!! I guess I’m not the best judge but I think it’s both and I’m also bloody hopeless in the DIY department, I’d buy the wrong rope or something. So this is where I say goodbye and return to looking for more James Deen vids (not really but I may check some out in future) as I wait for my latest erotic fiction fix. ciao